Michal Novansky vs William Grant Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second Serve Performance: Grant has secured 42.26% of points on their second serve in the past six months, trailing Novansky's 45.51%. This statistic often predicts match outcomes.
• Return Game Stats: When responding to opponents' second serves, Grant wins 44.84% of points, slightly lower than Novansky's 44.87%. For first serves, Grant is at 24.35%, again just beneath Novansky's 24.9%.
• Under Pressure Analysis: In past matches, Grant saved 50.71% of breakpoints, whereas Novansky shows superior performance with a 54.24% breakpoint save rate.
• Performance Overview: Over the last year, Grant has a win rate of 48.33%, considerably less than Novansky's 71.43%.
• Best Surface: Grant excels on indoor hard courts with a 58% win rate, while Novansky's best performance is on hard surfaces with a 62% success rate. Which surface provides the edge?
• Player Level: Both players frequently compete in ITF events, with Grant winning 53.7% of these matches and Novansky boasting a significant 71.43% win rate.
• Opponent Quality: Grant's competition had an average rank of 279.2, whereas Novansky faced tougher opponents with an average rank of 162.19.
• Deciding Set Performance: In the last year, Grant has won 36% of deciding sets, a lower figure compared to Novansky's 50% success rate.
• Break Point Conversion: A decisive stat, Grant converts 36.36% of breakpoint chances, while Novansky slightly outperforms at 37.5%.

Editorial Prediction (September 17, 2025, UTC):

Analyzing recent statistics and performance data, Novansky appears to have a slight edge over Grant, particularly in second serve success and pressure situations. Novansky's formidable 71.43% win record over the past year demonstrates a higher winning consistency compared to Grant.

In match-ups against higher-ranked opponents on average, Novansky has held their ground, suggesting adaptability and resilience in tougher scenarios. This is evidenced by superior success rates in crucial moments, such as breakpoint saves and deciding sets.

While Grant has strengths on indoor hard courts, Novansky's overall performance, especially on hard surfaces, positions them favorably in the upcoming match.

Given these comparative insights, Novansky is projected as the more likely winner of the forthcoming tennis match.